Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Madras HC Upholds CBFC's Ban on "Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal" Film Over Religious Content

Madras HC Upholds CBFC's Ban on   "Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal" Film Over Religious Content 

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1242531761182425

The Madras High Court has upheld the CBFC's decision to deny certification to Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal, ruling that the film violated certification guidelines by depicting content considered contemptuous of religious beliefs. The Court also reiterated that freedom of expression is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.

Perception(Victim Consciousness Vs Guilty Consciousness Vs Jealousy Consciousness) Vs (2) Evolution(Under evolved Vs Over evolved Vs Wrongly evolved) Vs (3) Truth(Fact Vs Myth Vs Mix of the both). Rule of law is Interpretative, not Absolute. Consciousness includes both directions, like, either feeling Unnecessarily Guilty or Not feeling Guilty even when one is supposed to feel guilty.

CBFC row: Madras High Court judge watches film submitted on pen drive Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal  reserves orders Mohamed Imranullah S.

Justice R. Kalaimathi of Madras High Court reserves orders on an appeal filed against refusal of CBFC certificate to Tamil movie Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal

Updated - April 10, 2026 06:03 pm IST - CHENNAI

Justice R. Kalaimathi of the Madras High Court watched the Tamil movie Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal submitted before the court by the film production firm in a pen drive and reserved orders on an appeal preferred against the denial of exhibition certificate to it by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).


(1) 1d
  • Reply
  • Edited
Top fan
Hariprasad GV
Systems are Hierarchical, Subjects are Infinite and are Intertwined, Conflicts are Omnipresent, Rule of law is Interpretative, not Absolute and Time dissolves Karma.
  • 1d
  • Reply
Giridhar Kattepogu
I wonder where Justice Goda Raghuram is now who allowed the release of Da Vinci Code which depicted falsehood about Christ and hurt the religious sentiments of Christians? This is just partiality. Judges give undue advantage to Hindus over non-Hindus.
  • 8h
  • Reply
  • Edited

When Central government senior panel counsel K.R. Samratt, representing the CBFC, expressed doubt about whether the production firm had submitted the same version of the movie before the court as it had before the Board, the judge wondered why such doubts were being raised against the appellant.

Stating she had watched the movie from the pen drive submitted in a sealed cover, the judge asked the petitioner’s counsel K. Chandramohan, as well as the CBFC counsel, to file their short written submissions before reserving her verdict, without mentioning when it would be pronounced.

Youreka Cinema School, owned by J. Joseph Mohan Kumar, had produced Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal with a cast that included several debutant actors playing the lead roles. He said, yesteryear actor K.R. Vijaya and acclaimed drums player Sivamani had played important characters alongside the new faces.

The lyrics for the songs had been penned by Vairamuthu and the movie was submitted for certification on September 10, 2025, on payment of ₹28,084 towards certification fee. On September 29, 2025, the CBFC’s Chennai Region Director D. Balamurali wrote to the producer refusing to issue a certificate for the movie.

The reason cited for denial of the certificate was that the five-member examining committee was of the view that the movie had multiple visuals and dialogues contemptuous of religious groups. The producer chose to take the matter on appeal to a nine-member revising committee of the CBFC but ended up facing the same result.

The revising committee, too, refused to recommend the movie for public exhibition and hence, the producer had chosen to file the present civil miscellaneous appeal before the High Court since the erstwhile Cinematograph Appellate Tribunal had been abolished and therefore, appeals would lie only before the High Court.

CBFC’s counter

In its counter affidavit to the appeal, the CBFC contended that certification could be denied if a movie, as a whole, persistently portrays a particular section of society in a derogatory and prejudicial manner and when such narratives are bound to disrupt public order and undermine social harmony.

Accordingly, both the five-member examining committee as well as a nine-member revising committee that Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal was not fit for certification because “it portrays its interpretation of various belief systems in their adaption of modern science, rituals based on beliefs, treatment of women and downtrodden and caste-based discrimination and consistently portrays one belief system in bad light and the other one as emancipating.”


Denial of censor certificate: Producers of Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal move Madras High Court

Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi orders notice to CBFC and grants time till February 3 for filing a counter affidavit

Published - January 25, 2026 09:53 am IST - CHENNAI


A poster of the movie Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal | Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

Close on the heels of actor Vijay’s Jana Nayagan censor row, the producers of yet another Tamil movie have approached the Madras High Court against the refusal of censor certificate to it by Central Board of Film Certificate (CBFC) on the ground that the movie had many visuals and dialogues contemptuous of religious groups and hence not suitable for public exhibition.

Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi has ordered notice to the CBFC on the statutory appeal filed by the production house against the refusal order and granted time till February 3, 2026 for the board to file its counter affidavit. The order was passed after hearing advocate M. Santhanaraman for the appellant who contended the refusal to issue a certificate was without application of mind.

The counsel told the court Chennai based Youreka Cinema School, owned by J. Joseph Mohan Kumar, had produced a romantic movie titled Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal with several debutant actors playing the lead roles. He said, renowned film actor K.R. Vijaya and acclaimed drums player Sivamani had played important characters alongside the new faces.

The lyrics for the songs had been penned by Vairamuthu. The movie was submitted for certification on September 10, 2025 on payment of ₹28,084 towards certification fee. On September 29, 2025, the CBFC’s Chennai Region Director D. Balamurali wrote to the producer refusing to issue a certificate for the movie.

“I am directed by the Board to inform you that the film has been viewed by the Examining Committee (comprising five members) and the Board has come to the conclusion that a certificate cannot be issued for its exhibition,” the communication read. It said the reason for denial of certificate was the movie had multiple visuals and dialogues contemptuous of religious groups.

The producer was informed he could prefer an appeal to the revising committee within 14 days as per the provisions of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024. Accordingly, the producer went on appeal but the nine-member revising committee too concurred with the decision of the five-member examining committee and concluded the movie should not be allowed for public exhibition.

Giving additional reasons for its decision, the revising committe said, the movie “portrays its interpretation of various belief systems in their adaption of modern science, rituals based on beliefs, treatment of women and downtrodden and caste-based discrimination and consistently portrays one belief system in bad light and the other one as emancipating, throughout the film, maliciously. Overall, it affects the social fabric of the society negatively. Hence the film is refused certification.”

The CBFC Regional Director had conveyed the revising committee’s decision to the producer on December 16, 2025 and hence the production house had come on further appeal to the High Court since the Cinematograph Appellate Tribunal had been abolished and therefore, the appeal would lie only before the High Court as per the provisions of the Tribunal Reforms Act of 2021.

Assailing the reasons cited for refusal of certification, Mr. Santhanaraman contended the CBFC could not pass a blanket order refusing to certify the movie without specifying which of the particular scenes or dialogues reportedly violate the guidelines issued for film certification.

He said, the whole idea behind Lakshmi Lawrence Kadhal was only to convey the message that art forms such as Bharatanatyam were universal, without any religious identity, and they could be performed by any person, irrespective of his/her religion, by learning the niceties. Such an expression of opinion does not warrant a blanket ban, he argued.

No comments:

Post a Comment

இந்து சமய அறநிலையத்துறை செயலாளராக திரு.குமரகுருபரன் IAS மீது சென்னை மாநகராட்சி ஆணையராக இருந்தபோது சுமார் 11 ஆயிரம் கோடி ஊழல் புகார்

https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=27608486728839623&set=pcb.27608487098839586 தமிழக வெற்றி கழகம் ஆட்சிக்கு வந்த பிறகு எந்த ஒரு லஞ்சம் ...