Pastor Chris In Miracle Scandal
Thursday, November 26, 2015 by Michael Abimboye
Popular Nigerian pastor and head of Believers World, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome has yet again been involved in another controversy. Pastor Chris Oyakhilome [article_adwert] This time, the pastor has been accused by a member of his own church of staging miracle-healing sessions. According to a report by South Africa’s Sowetan, followers have said that he has been hiring people to pretend to be sick and disabled and then “be healed” during his television shows and public prayer meetings. “I was offered R10 000 to rehearse and pretend to be in a wheelchair three weeks before the all-night prayer called Night of Bliss at the Johannesburg Stadium,” the newspaper quoted a member of the church. “The pastor told me that they were looking for people to work for the church. He said that I was going to sit in a wheelchair and be wheeled around while pretending to be physically ill. I would then stand up and walk as soon as Pastor Chris stopped praying for me. “Even children who are healthy are whisked around in wheelchairs. Some use crutches. Everyone is allocated a person who tells the congregation about your background, your specific illness and suffering. “The pastor then raises his hands and places them maybe on your legs if you cannot walk, and a few seconds later you get up and walk around the room,” the source said. He claimed he called the church the day after their offer and turned them down. READ ALSO: Chris Okotie Under Fire From Christian Elders “I just told myself that using the word of God to lie to desperate people is immoral, so I refused to take up their offer.” Also speaking about the pay-for-miracle, another worshiper of the church, said: “When he started healing people, I did not see him call anyone from the audience. The people that he ‘healed’ came from a certain section of the audience and it looked like he came with them especially for the event. “I saw a lot of people in wheelchairs leaving the venue who had not been healed. It was very sad." Recall that pastor Chris and his wife Anita publicly filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. Also, Seun Kuti in a recent interview criticised Pastors Chris Oyakhilome of Christ Embassy and Chris Okotie of Household of God. Source: Legit.ng Read more: https://www.legit.ng/648933-pastor-chris-paid-fake-miracle-church-member.html
.jpg)
.jpg)
UK govt’s probe uncovers massive fraud in Oyakhilome’s Christ Embassy
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/369651-uk-govts-probe-uncovers-massive-fraud-in-oyakhilomes-christ-embassy.html
After a five-year-long investigation into the finances of United Kingdom (UK) branch of Christ Embassy, founded by popular mega-church pastor, Chris Oyakhilome, the UK Charity Commission has indicted the church’s board of trustees of a wide range of fraudulent practices including illegally paying more than N827 million (£1,767,250) to entities and organisations it shares close relationships with.
According to the outcome of the inquiry published by the Charity Commission on its website last month, the church’s board of trustees was incriminated for shoddy management of the church’s account, arbitrary and curious payments, failure to comply with its grant-making policy, inadequate recording of its decision making processes and serious misconduct and/or mismanagement in the charity’s administration.
In one particularly disturbing instance, the inquiry found evidence the church may be laundering or diverting funds of up to N288 million (£615,420.00) from its UK branches to six accounts controlled by the church’s Nigerian branch, Christ Embassy Nigeria.
The Charity Commission also found that the church, which was founded in 1996 and has over 90 worship centres across the UK, illegally registered three properties in the names of two members of its board of trustees, failed to pay taxes worth over £250,000 on expenditures by employees, failed to secure adequate insurance, and had an instance of criminal violation of British town planning and building regulations.
The inquiry
In 2014, the Charity Commission, which regulates charities in England and Wales, announced it was opening a statutory inquiry to investigate Christ Embassy over “a number of serious concerns relating to the use of charitable funds, in particular, large connected party payments and the potential misapplication of grant funding.”
The commission had originally interviewed members of the church’s board of trustees and perused the records and books of the church for a year. Still not convinced that the church has prudently management its finances, it sidelined its board of trustees and appointed Rod Weston of the international audit and accounting firm, Mazar, as interim manager (IM) to take over the management of the church in what it described as “temporary and protective measure.”
In the final report of the inquiry published on November 14, the interim manager stated that the scope of the inquiry was to examine the church’s transactions with “partner organisations” including “grants made to a number of unidentified entities and Loveworld Television Ministry, Healing School, International School of Ministry, Christ Embassy France, Christ Embassy Canada, IPCC Conference and Rhapsody of Realities.”
The inquiry also covers “the administration, governance and management of the charity by the trustees with specific regard to connected party transactions in respect of payments to Loveworld Limited and the management of conflicts of interest,” its “financial controls and management” as well as “whether or not the trustees had complied with and fulfilled their duties and responsibilities as trustees under charity law.”
Payments to “partner organisations”
After going through the church’s account between 2009 and 2011, inquiry team found that its board of trustees paid substantial grants to organisations classified as “partner organisations” in clear violation of its own grant-making policy and the Charity Commission’s regulation.
“During 2009-2011, the charity’s accounts show grants amounting to £1,281,666 were paid to Loveworld Television Ministry; £118,995 to Healing School, £186,616 to International School of Ministry, £10,000 to Christ Embassy Canada, £10,566 to Christ Embassy France, £37,216 to IPPC Conference and £77,266 to Rhapsody of Realities,” the report stated.
However, despite telling the inquiry team that its “grant-making practice consisted of a discussion by the Trustees at a Trustee meeting regarding who should receive grant”, the interim manager (IM) found no evidence of compliance with the said grant-making policy.
“Documents examined, by the IM, demonstrated a lack of records and receipts to account for grants made and there appeared to be little consideration given to whether the receiving parties had expended grants appropriately and for intended purposes, as was required by the policy.
“This demonstrates a failure to comply with its grant-making policy and inadequate recording of decision-making by the trustees which are misconduct and/or mismanagement in the administration of the charity,” the report stated.
The inquiry particularly found the transaction with Loveworld Limited curious. The board of trustees told the interim manager that the company, which is owned by a trustee of the church, Obioma Chiemeka (2009-2015), with the objective to “advance Christian programming in the UK and to provide entertainment and educational programme on radio and television,” was paid for broadcasting services. But when told to provide documentation of the decisions made by the board in relation to the payments to Loveworld, the church only provided two sets of minutes of trustees’ meetings that appeared relevant to the issue.
“However, neither set of minutes included any decision or resolution to make payments to a company of which one trustee was sole shareholder,” the report stated.
“The trustees did not have any formal contracts in place or indeed rationale for using Loveworld Limited as opposed to any other broadcaster,” it added.
“During his inspection of books and records found no evidence to suggest that any of the trustees considered whether the costs charged by Loveworld Limited were better valued than the costs charged by any other service provider. The trustees have failed to take, or have failed to record, any proper decisions as to why such payments are in the best interests of the Charity,” the report further stated.
The report stated that Christ Embassy had failed to follow a 2009 recommendation by auditors to seek professional advice on payment to related parties.
The inquiry also found that the church allowed Loveworld Limited to use its £1.8 million property for free between 2006 and September 2012. When queried about this, the trustees told the inquiry team that Loveworld Limited occupied a “small part of the premises” on an informal basis. They said Loveworld was subsequently charged £75,000 per year for the use of the property.
However, the inquiry stated that due to the level of rent Loveworld was subsequently charged, it must have occupied “a substantial proportion of the building”. The inquiry also found that the church was subsidizing a proportion of Loveworld Limited’s utility bills.
“These actions were not in the charity’s best interest or in furtherance of its objects and were misconduct and/or mismanagement in the administration of the charity,” it stated.
Payment to Ventaja Limited
The inquiry also discovered that in 2013, the church paid Ventaja Limited £44,925 for construction and decoration of a stage. It, however, found that the company was wholly owned by a member of the church’s board of trustees, Tony Obi (2014 -2015), who was also a zonal pastor of the church. If further revealed that Mr Obi’s wife, a director of Ventaja, was a pastor of the church and salaried employee.
“The IM found evidence indicating that Trustee G had employed the services of Ventaja Limited to provide services to the charity, but it was unclear from the charity’s records what considerations were made regarding potential conflicts of interest. It is unclear to the Commission that the decision-making trustees, in position at the time payments were made, were acting only in the interests of the charity.
“The trustees failed to provide any records to evidence that conflicts of interest had been identified or correctly managed prior to the opening of the Inquiry,” the report stated.
Possible money laundering and diversion of fund
The investigation identified nine active bank accounts, which the church’s board of trustees claimed was holding funds belonging to Christ Embassy Nigeria, a separate entity from Christ Embassy UK. However, there was no evidence that the banks holding the funds were aware they were holding funds belonging to Christ Embassy Nigeria.
READ ALSO: “My husband is fond of raping me”, divorce-seeking wife tells court
The report stated that the accounts were not named in a sure way to indicate that the funds were controlled from Nigeria. In fact, two of the nine active accounts were named “Christ Embassy East London”.
Thus, the inquiry placed a freezing order on the funds (£615,420.00) in the account.
“The inquiry, not being satisfied that the funds held in these accounts were owned by Christ Embassy Nigeria, exercised legal powers and issued orders dated 8 august 2014, under section 76(3)(d) of the Act, freezing six of these nine bank accounts, protecting funds to a value of £615,420.”
![Christ Embassy Nigeria [Photo: encomium.ng]](https://i1.wp.com/media.premiumtimesng.com/wp-content/files/2019/12/Christ-Embassy.jpg?w=496&h=305&ssl=1 "Christ Embassy Nigeria [Photo: encomium.ng]")
“In the absence of clear evidence to support the trustees’ position, the Inquiry concluded that funds held in the accounts belonged to the charity and these accounts remained frozen until the order was revoked on 24 August 2016. The Inquiry being satisfied that the new board of trustees had assumed control of the charity’s property discharged the freezing order on 24 August 2016.”
Tax issues
The inquiry also discovered that the church maintained a shoddy tax record such as the failure to submit its self-assessment tax returns for 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 on time thereby incurring penalties.
It further found that the church did not maintain “sufficient records or processes to show that expenditure by employees had not been an employee benefit and therefore subject to tax;” as well as kept “sufficient records to show that charity vehicles were being used solely for charitable purposes and not used by trustees/employees for private use.”
The interim manager agreed to pay £250,000 to settle these violations with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
Hidden properties
The inquiry team also discovered 3 UK properties that were not disclosed by the board of trustees. The legal titles of the properties were vested in the name of two of the charity’s trustees. When asked about the properties, the church’s board of trustee claimed they “were acquired on behalf of, and held in trust for, Christ Embassy Nigeria”.
However, the inquiry team “noted that the Land Registry entries in respect of the 3 properties made no reference to the beneficial owner being Christ Embassy Nigeria and documentation supplied by the trustees provided no evidence to support their assertions. None of the Land Registry proprietorship registers differed in any material way from those of the properties originally disclosed to the Commission as belonging to the charity.
“These matters were explored further by the IM. His investigations confirmed that the properties were held legally and beneficially by the charity and that there was no trust in place suggesting they were held on behalf of Christ Embassy Nigeria.
“The Inquiry obtained evidence that the trustees’ failed to ensure land registry details for charity properties were amended once trustees resigned. This was raised a number of times by Auditors in their reports from 2009 onwards and as a result, the trustees failed in their duties and responsibilities as trustees to act in the charity’s best interests,” the report stated.
Inadequate insurance cover
Christ Embassy UK did not take proper insurance to protect the church’s assets and protect against claims for accidental damage to properties/compensation for accidental injury to third parties, the inquiry found.
In one instance, the interim manager decided to pay an undisclosed settlement for a claim made by a member of the congregation who was injured at the church’s premises.
“The failings of trustees to act appropriately left the charity open to financial and reputational risk and losses, as well as to the risk of litigation.”
Planning violation
The church continued to use a property as a place of worship without obtaining the necessary planning permission from the local authority.
Despite losing a couple of appeals to allow it to use the property as a place of worship, the church continued its authorised use thereby exposing it to enforcement action.
“The IM team liaised with the Council to permit a planned exit from the premises which was vacated in January 2015.
“The existence of the enforcement notice is a criminal matter. Any breach of the enforcement notice and continued unauthorised use of the premises as a place of worship exposed the charity to prosecution by Southwark Council. Legal advice obtained by the IM confirmed that the breach could have led to criminal sanctions being imposed against the charity and potentially exposed the charity to confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
“This demonstrates the trustees’ lack of understanding regarding planning law and regulations which exposed the charity to substantial financial risk as well as legal costs,” the report stated.
Penalties
Having found widespread evidence of misconduct and/or mismanagement, the interim management exercised its power to remove two of the trustees of the church (names not disclosed). However, the said trustees resigned before the commission could complete the process.
The report, however, said the loopholes that allowed trustees to be removed, which stops them from acting as trustees in the future has been closed by an amendment of the Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Act 2016 “thereby allowing the Commission to proceed to remove a charity trustee who has resigned following the Commission having given notice to the charity trustees of its intention to make a removal order.”
The interim manager also appointed a new board of trustees for the church in 2016, having discharged his duty.
The interim manager also considered asking former trustees of the church to pay restitution for breaches of duties and losses the church suffered but decided against it after professional advice.
The full report of the Charity Commission inquiry on Christ Embassy can be read here. https://www.pulse.ng/news/local/chris-oyakhilomes-christ-embassy-indicted-for-fraud/8djyeel
UK government exposes fraudulent activities in Chris Oyakhilome's Christ Embassy
The fraud in which Christ Embassy was mentioned in, include -non-compliance to tax obligation, undisclosed assets, management misconduct, amongst others.
A five-year long investigation of the United Kingdom (UK) branch of Christ Embassy and its board of trustees, has uncovered some fraudulent activities in the church.
The investigation carried out by UK Charity Commission, exposed the massive fraud in the mega-church under the leadership of Pastor Chris Oyakhilome.
The probe
The commission, in a report made available to the public, has it that there were serious misconduct and mismanagement in the church’s administration, inadequate recording of its decision-making processes and failure to comply with its grant-making policy.
![Pastor Chris Oyakhilome and his church, Christ Embassy are yet to respond to the uncovered investigation, which was published on November 14, 2019. [HO Ojewale]](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg'%20width%3D'676'%20height%3D'420'%20data-ring-placeholder%3D'1'%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E "Pastor Chris Oyakhilome and his church, Christ Embassy are yet to respond to the uncovered investigation, which was published on November 14, 2019. [HO Ojewale]")
The commission had launched a probe into the church's UK-branch finances, to investigate issues ranging from transactions between the church and “partner organisations”, administration; governance and management of the charity; financial controls and management of the charity and if the trustees had complied with their responsibilities under the charity law.
Uncovered fraud
According to the commission, the church’s board of trustees carried out a wide range of fraudulent practices, and between 2009 and 2011, Christ Embassy paid substantial grants to organisations classified as “partner organisation”.
As stated in the report, the church’s account showed grants amounting to £1,281,666 which were paid to Loveworld Television Ministry; £118,995 to Healing School, £186,616 to International School of Ministry, £10,000 to Christ Embassy Canada, £10,566 to Christ Embassy France, £37,216 to IPPC Conference and £77,266 to Rhapsody of Realities.
The UK inquiry also found out that the church allowed Loveworld Limited to make use of its property valued at £1.8 million from 2006 to 2012 for free.
When summoned, the trustees said Loveworld had only occupied a “small part of the premises”, on an informal basis, adding that the arrangement had been formalised since 2012 and the company was charged £75,000 per year for use of the property.
Contrary to the church's defense, the inquiry considered that the level of rent indicates that Loveworld Limited occupied a substantial proportion of the building.
![Christ Embassy headquarters in Folkestone, Kent, a county in southeastern England. [thirdsector]](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg'%20width%3D'790'%20height%3D'526'%20data-ring-placeholder%3D'1'%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E "Christ Embassy headquarters in Folkestone, Kent, a county in southeastern England. [thirdsector]")
“This indicates that the trustees failed to act in the charity’s best interests or with reasonable care and skill in terms of their decision-making and in the negotiation of the arrangements with Loveworld Limited and is not seeking appropriate advice regarding formalising occupation of premises by the company,” it said.
Management misconduct
After examining the church’s financial records, the Interim Manager (IM) found no evidence of compliance with the church’s grant-making policy in the documents examined.
“Documents examined showed a lack of records and receipts to account for grants made and there appeared to be little consideration given to whether the receiving parties had expended grants appropriately and for intended purposes, as was required by the policy.
“This demonstrates failure to comply with its grant-making policy and inadequate recording of decision making by the trustees which is misconduct and/or mismanagement in the administration of the charity," the report read.
Suspicious mode of operating bank accounts
Cash collection and payment recording processes were not uniform across the charity, as nine bank accounts hold funds belonging to Christ Embassy, Nigeria which is a separate company to the church.
According to the UK government, no evidence was found to suggest that any of the banking institutions were aware that they were holding funds controlled by Christ Embassy Nigeria.
The report read further, “In addition, the accounts were not named in such a way as would indicate the funds are controlled from Nigeria: for example, two of the active accounts are named Christ Embassy East London.
“The inquiry, not being satisfied that the funds held in these accounts were owned by Christ Embassy Nigeria, exercised legal powers and issued orders dated 8 august 2014, under section 76(3)(d) of the Act, freezing six of these nine bank accounts, protecting funds to a value of £615,420.
“In the absence of clear evidence to support the trustees’ position, the Inquiry concluded that funds held in the accounts belonged to the charity and these accounts remained frozen until the order was revoked on 24 August 2016.
“This demonstrates the trustees’ failure to deal with the bank accounts appropriately and their lack of understanding of financial management and the importance of clearly identifying the charity’s property and/or assets held on behalf of another entity and is mismanagement and/or misconduct in the administration and governance of the charity by the trustees.”
Non-compliance with tax obligations
The trustees, in the report, were said to have failed to submit the church’s 2010-11 and 2012-13 self-assessment tax returns on time, an action that has attracted penalties.
The report added, "The IM established that the charity had failed to maintain sufficient records or processes to show that expenditure by employees had not been an employee benefit and therefore subject to tax.
“Sufficient records to show that charity vehicles were being used solely for charitable purposes and not used by trustees/employees for private use; sufficient records to support the charity’s claim to Gift Aid and to demonstrate the expenditure was in fact charitable.
“The interim manager agreed to pay £250,000 to settle these violations with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).”
Undisclosed assets
Three UK properties, according to the uncovered investigation, were not disclosed to the commission by the trustees.
The trustees reportedly said despite the legal title of the properties being vested in the name of two of the church’s trustees, the properties “were acquired on behalf of, and held in trust for, Christ Embassy Nigeria”.
But the Inquiry noted that "the Land Registry entries in respect of the three properties made no reference to the beneficial owner being Christ Embassy Nigeria and documentation supplied by the trustees provided no evidence to support their assertions.”
Inadequate Insurance
Christ Embassy in the UK did not take proper insurance to protect the church’s assets and against claims for accidental damage to properties/compensation for accidental injury to third parties.
According to the Inquiry, the failings of trustees to act appropriately left the charity open to financial and reputational risk and losses, as well as to the risk of litigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment